K.Irudayaraj v. Tmt.Sabitha
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed contempt petition for non-compliance of earlier order. Respondent Special Government Pleader submitted arrears were sanctioned and credited. Court closed contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.10.2014
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
Contempt Petition No.161 of 2014
K.Irudayaraj ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Sabitha,
The State of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by the Secretary to Government,
School Education Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.Rameswara Murugan,
The Director of School Education (Hr. Secondary),
College Road,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 006.
3.R.Easwaran,
The Chief Educational Officer,
Salem, Salem District. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for the wilful
disobedience of the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.10982 of 2012 dated 20.4.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Thirupathi For respondent : Mrs.A.Sri Jayanthi Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This Contempt Petition has been filed for non-
compliance of the order of this Court made in W.P.No.10982 of 2012, dated 20.4.2012, wherein a direction was issued https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Irudayaraj
- respondent
Sabitha
- respondent
The State of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
Rameswara Murugan
- respondent
R.Easwaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court