Disposed

N.Panayan v. D.Sabitha

Madras HC9 Oct 2014CONT P/1330/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act regarding non-compliance of a previous high court order. The respondents counsel submitted that the order was complied with and benefits were paid. The court recorded the submission and closed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition closed upon confirmation that the orders passed in W.P.No.18600 of 2012 were complied with.

N.Panayan Vs D.Sabitha — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09.10.2014

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR

¶6

Contempt Petition No.1330 of 2014

¶7

N.Panayan 2. A.Savithiri 3. P.Gunavathy 4. R.Logamani 5. M.Indirani 6. K.Surulivelu 7. S.Narayanaswami 8. R.Somasundaram 9. A.Karupaiya 10.R.Subramaniyan .. Petitioners Vs. 1. Mrs.Sabitha Secretary to Government The State of Tamilnadu School Education Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2. Mr.M. Vasu The Chief Educational Officer, Theni, Theni District.

¶8

Senthil Murugan The Chief Educational Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District

¶9

.. Respondents

¶10

This petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to haul the respondents for non compliance of the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.18600 of 2012 dated 20.07.2012.

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr.P.Deivendra For Respondents : Ms.A.Sri Jayanthi, SGP

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This Contempt Petition is filed against non-

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

compliance of the direction issued in W.P.No.18600 of

¶16

¶17

2012 dated 20.07.2012 giving direction to the

¶18

respondent to extend the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.216, Finance (PC) Department, dated 22.03.1993.

¶19

The learned Special Government Pleader submits that the order of this Court is complied with granting

¶20

approval and paying the benefits to the petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioners is also satisfied with the said payment. 3. Recording the said submission of the learned Special Government Pleader, this Contempt petition is closed. rg SD/ DEPUTY REGISTRAR(CLAA) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2015.

¶21

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. SS/CO/12/05/2015 One CC to Government Pleader, SR.11813 To 1. Mrs.Sabitha Secretary to Government The State of Tamilnadu School Education Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶22

Mr.M. Vasu The Chief Educational Officer, Theni, Theni District.

¶23

Senthil Murugan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ The Chief Educational Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District

N.Panayan v. D.Sabitha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Panayan v. D.Sabitha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Shanmugasundaram Vs K.S.Ravichandran

K.Ramalingam Vs D.Sabitha IAS

P.Raju Vs Sabitha

S.Vijaya, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

C.Pannerselvam Vs Sabitha

V.Subbathal, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu