Disposed

K.Dhanam v. Mrs.Sabitha

Madras HC17 Oct 2014CONT P/136/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Certiorari issued by this Court to quash the order dated 10.04.2012 in W.P.No.9058 of 2012. The petitioner was directed to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.216, Finance (PC) Department, dated 22.03.1993 to the petitioner and to revise the pensionary benefits and pay arrears within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petition was filed under Section 11 of th

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition is closed as the order dated 10.4.2012 is complied with by sanitating the arrears amount of Rs.1,03,722/- and also credited to the account of the contempt petitioner on 09.09.2014. N

K.Dhanam Vs Mrs.Sabitha — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 17.10.2014

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR

¶6

Contempt Petition No.136 of 2014
K.Dhanam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Sabitha,
The State of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by the Secretary to Government,
School Education Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.Rameswara Murugan,
The Director of School Education (Hr. Secondary),
College Road,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 006.
3.K.Selvakumar,
The Chief Educational Officer,
Trichy, Trichy District. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for the wilful
disobedience of the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.9058 of 2012 dated 10.4.2012.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Thirupathi

¶8

For respondent : Mrs.A.Sri Jayanthi Special Government Pleader

¶9

ORDER

¶10

This Contempt Petition has been filed for non-

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ compliance of the order of this Court made in W.P.No.9058

¶12

¶13

of 2012, dated 10.4.2012, wherein a direction was issued to the respondents to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.216, Finance (PC) Department, dated 22.03.1993 to the petitioner and to revise the pensionary benefits and pay arrears within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a

¶14

copy of this order.

¶15

2.The learned Special Government Pleader submits that
the arrears amount of Rs.1,03,722/- has been sanctioned and
also credited to the account of the contempt petitioner on
09.09.2014.
3. Recording the said submission, the order of this
Court dated 10.4.2012 in W.P.No.9058 of 2012 is complied
with. Hence, the Contempt Petition is closed. No costs.
bbr
SD/-(21/11/2014)
DEPUTY REGISTRAR(CLAA)
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2014.

¶16

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶17

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

One CC to Government Pleader, SR.12229

K.Dhanam v. Mrs.Sabitha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Dhanam v. Mrs.Sabitha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Panayan Vs D.Sabitha

S.Vijaya, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

C.Pannerselvam Vs Sabitha

K.Bheeman Vs Sabitha

K.Krishnan Vs Sabitha

A.R.Chandran Vs Sabitha