K.Bheeman v. Sabitha
Case brief
What is this about?
The Courtdisposed of a contempt petition filed for non-compliance of an earlier order directing pension benefit revision. The respondent submitted that arrears were sanctioned and credited, leading the Court to close the petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed. No costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.10.2014
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
Contempt Petition No.1752 of 2014
K.Bheeman ... Petitioner
Vs.
Sabitha,
Secretary,
Education Department,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. ... Respondent
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for the wilful
disobedience of the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.17778 of 2012 dated 11.7.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Bobblie
For respondent : Mr.P.Chinnadurai
Government Advocate
ORDER
This Contempt Petition has been filed for noncompliance of the order of this Court made in W.P.No.17778 of 2012, dated 11.7.2012, wherein a direction was issued to the respondents to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.216, Finance (PC) Department, dated 22.03.1993 to the petitioner and to revise the pensionary benefits and pay arrears within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a
copy of this order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Bheeman
- respondent
Sabitha
Coram
N.Paul Vasanthakumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court