Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of an order and renewal of a saw mill license. The Court found that the petitioner had withdrawn the petition with the endorsement filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.03.2013 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.2087 of 2013
and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013
A.Thiraviyam : Petitioner
vs.
Virudhunagar District. : Respondents
PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order made in Na.Ka.No.1015/2012-M dated 27.11.12 on the file of the second respondent and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to renew the licence of the petitioner to his Saw Mill namely Backiyalakshmi Saw Mill Industries situated at Pillaiyar Natham Village, Madurai Road, Srivilliputtur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu
For Respondents : Mr.TR.Janarthanan,
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/TRUE COPY/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
W.P.(MD)No.2087 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 05.03.2013
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Thiraviyam
The District Forest Officer, Virudhunagar District
The Wildlife Warden
The Forest Range Officer, Srivilliputtur Range
R.S.Ramanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
