The Madurai Bench quashed proceedings against petitioners in a Section 324 IPC case following a filed memorandum of compromise, relying on Gian Singh v. State of Punjab.
Proceedings in C.C.No.104 of 2009 regarding the petitioners/accused are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 18.11.2013
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14969 of 2013
1.S.Sahul Hameed
2.A.Ismail 3.S.Hakkeem Raja 4.S.Raja @ Raja Mohamed ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 4
Vs.
1.State through The Inspector of Police, Vilakkuthoon Police Station, Madurai. ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.A.Sulthan Alavudheen ... 2nd Respondent/De-facto Complainant
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to charge sheet in C.C.No.104 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai and quash the same.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Pandi Maharaja For Respondent 1 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For Respondent 2 : Mr.C.M.Arumugam
ORDER
This petition seeks to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.104 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai so far as these petitioners/accused are concerned.
2.The petitioners are all facing prosecution for offence under Section 324 I.P.C, in C.C.No.104 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai.
2
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(writs) /True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai .
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14969 of 2013 18.11.2013
vs
pbk 27/11/2013 ::2p-4c:
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the charge sheet in C.C.No.104 of 2009 may be quashed given the existence of a signed memorandum of compromise between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and anotherFollowed¶17
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another, (2012) 10 SCC 303 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S. Sahul Hameed & Others
State through The Inspector of Police, Vilakkuthoon
A. Sulthan Alavudheen
C.T. Selvam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
