The petitioner filed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court noted that the petition had not been pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Sixth day of September Two Thousand Thirteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM
CRL OP(MD) No.13119 of 2013
CHELLADURAI ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.4
Vs THE STATE REP.BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CBCID, TRICHY DIST, CR.NO.2/2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
TO
1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CBCID, TRICHY DISTRICT. 2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
CRL OP(MD) No.13119 of 2013 Date :06/09/2013 rg.12.09.2013 1p/3c.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. which was not pressed by the counsel should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CHELLADURAI
THE STATE
C.T. SELVAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
