Sharafudeen v. the Revenue Divisional Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitioner sought to withdraw the petition as the grievance was redressed. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 17TH ASWINA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 20724 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
SHARAFUDEEN, AGED 60 YEARS S/O. AHAMMAD KHAN, SHARAFIYA MANZIL, VENGANOOR DESOM, VIZHINJAM VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695521
BY ADVS. G.P.SHINOD GOVIND PADMANAABHAN AJIT G ANJARLEKAR ATUL MATHEWS GAYATHRI S.B.
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695541
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 20724 OF 2023 : 2 :
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the grievance raised in this writ petition has been redressed and seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
SB
Sharafudeen
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Tahsildar
The Village Officer Thekkada
Murali Purushothaman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court