Suhara v. v.a.Sahadevan
Case brief
What is this about?
This Court closed a contempt petition after a report confirmed that the Respondents complied with a prior direction issued in WP(C) No. 14030/2021 regarding an RTA meeting decision.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt Case (C) was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 28TH MAGHA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 42 OF 2022 IN WP(C) 14030/2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 14030/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SUHARA
AGED 39 YEARS
W/O.BASHEER, APARAMBIL HOUSE, CHERURAL, MUSLIYARANGADI,
ANANTHAVOOR P.O., THIRUNAVAYA, MALAPPURAM - 676 301.
BY ADV I.DINESH MENON
NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUHARA
- respondent
SRI.V.A.SAHADEVAN AND ANR
Coram
SUNIL THOMAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court