The court recalled its earlier judgment due to a typographical error directing orders on the wrong exhibit and closed the contempt case without prejudice.
Original judgment recalled; contempt case closed; order to issue revised judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 27TH MAGHA, 1943 CON.CASE(C) NO. 631 OF 2021
(JUDGMENT DATED 15-01-2021 IN WP(C) 122/2021 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT)
PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER:
1 ELAYEDATH HAMEED (HAMEED E) AGED 53 YEARS S/O. MOIDEEN, ELAYEDATH HOUSE, KOLATHARA P.O. KOZHIKODE DISTRICT 673655.
BY ADVS. JOSEPH GEORGE SRI.P.A.REJIMON
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C):
1 E.MOHANDAS,
AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY OF REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KOZHIKODE, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, KOZHIKODE P.O. 673 001.
BY ADV. SMT REKHA S., SR. GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 631 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 16th day of February, 2022
When the matter was taken up, it was noticed that by judgment of this Court dated 15.01.2021 in W.P.(C.) No.122/2021 produced as Annexure-A1 in the contempt case, the authority was directed to pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1. In fact, the direction ought to have been to dispose of Ext.P2 rather than Ext.P1. Since, this is a typographical error, I deem it fit to recall that judgment suo motu .
Accordingly, Annexure-A1 judgment is recalled and the contempt case is closed directing that judgment in W.P.(C.) No.122/2021 dated 15.01.2021 will stand recalled and fresh judgment correcting the operative portion of the judgment, directing the authority to pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 is ordered. Accordingly, issue revised judgment.
Contempt Petition is closed.
Sd/-
SUNIL THOMAS
JUDGE
SKP/16-2
CON.CASE(C) NO. 631 OF 2021
3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 631/2021
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.01.2021 IN WPC 122/2021 OF THIS HONBLE COURT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
ELAYEDATH HAMEED
E.MOHANDAS
SUNIL THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
