facie, his contention does not appear to be correct in the light of Annexure-A2 produced by the petitioner himself along with the bail application. It is a networth certificate prepared by the Chartered Accountant of the petitioner himself regarding the financial position of the petitioner and his wife. He has assessed the value of the immovable property as Rs.2,63,59,000/-. The worth of the movable assets was Rs.2,40,04,814/- thereby totalling to Rs.5,03,63,814/-. The annual income of the petitioner was quantified at Rs.19,20,170/-. Even if the income of his wife and parents are cumulatively taken, it cannot prima facie satisfy the enormous assets seized from the petitioner. Hence, even according to the assessment of his own Chartered Accountant, the properties belong to the petitioner and his wife. The worth of the total properties appears to be highly excessive when compared with his own source of income of Rs.19,20,170/-. The check period is 20112021. Hence, prima facie, the contention of the petitioner that the properties were acquired with the income of his wife and that of his parents cannot also accepted at this point of time.
