Varghese M.George, v. Santosh Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court in a contempt petition considered the respondent's affidavit explaining delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the issuance of an administrative order rejecting the petitioner's application. The court closed the contempt case without prejudice to the petitioner's right to challenge the administrative order separately.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to challenge the administrative order in appropriate proceedings.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 1ST POUSHA, 1943 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1889 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 07.04.2021 IN WP(C) 8876/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
- 1 VARGHESE M.GEORGE, AGED 46 YEARS S/O.LATE V.GEORGE, MELATHIL HOUSE, ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-691 523.
- 2 ALEX M.GEORGE, AGED 41 YEARS S/O.LATE V.GEORGE, MELATHIL HOUSE, ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-691 523.
BY ADV SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS
RESPONDENT/S:
SANTOSH KUMAR, TAHSILDAR (LR), TALUK OFFICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-691 523.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's complaint of non-compliance with directions in a prior judgment is sustained.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Varghese M. George
- petitioner
Alex M. George
- respondent
Santosh Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court