Anuram v. Rageesh
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the petitioner alleged willful disobedience of an order directing the SHO to regulate autorickshaw parking. The SHO submitted that necessary steps had been taken. The court closed the matter.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed upon representation of compliance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 11TH PHALGUNA,
1943
CON.CASE(C)NO.411 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08.04.2021 IN W.P.(C)NO.6270 OF 2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
ANURAM, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. DIVAKARAN, MADATHUVILA, RAM VIEW, PRAVACHAMBALAM, NEMOM P. O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695020.
BY ADVS. R.T.PRADEEP M.BINDUDAS K.C.HARISH
RESPONDENT:
RAGEESH,
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS), STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NEMOM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY, NEMOM P. O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695020.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case should be closed upon the respondent's representation that strict compliance with the earlier order has been ensured
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anuram
- respondent
Rageesh
Coram
Anil K. Narendran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court