Petitioner filed contempt petition alleging non-compliance of directions for reassessment under Section 6A of Kerala Land Tax Act. Court accepted petitioner's submission that respondent complied with directions and closed the case without fresh orders.
Contempt case closed; no specific relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN SATURDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA,
1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1217 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
ANUPKUMAR M.A., AGED 49 YEARS S/O DR. S.AIYYAPAN PILLAI, INDIVARAM HOUSE, ALUVA.P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683101, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER DR.S.AIYYAPPAN PILLAI, AGED 75 YEARS, S/O SANKARA PILLAI(LATE), INDIVARAM HOUSE, ALUVA P.O, ERNAKULAM-683101.
BY ADV AVANEESH KOYIKKARA
RESPONDENT:
RENJITH GEORGE (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITONER) TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR, KANAYANNUR TALUK OFFICE, PARK AVENUE, NEAR SUBHASH PARK, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM.H.O.POST, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682011.
SRI JOBY JOSEPH -GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Cont.case(c)1217 OF 2021 2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed this Contempt Case, alleging noncompliance of the directions contained in Annexure A1 judgment of this Court dated 08.02.2021 in W.P.(C)No.21827 of 2020, whereby that writ petition was disposed of with the following directions;
Cont.case(c)1217 OF 2021 3
admission, the learned Government Pleader was directed to get instructions.
affidavit dated 24.08.2021 on behalf of the respondent.
the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent has already complied with the direction contained in Annexure A1 judgment.
Recording the above submission made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, this Contempt Case is closed.
Sd/-
ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE
yd
Cont.case(c)1217 OF 2021 4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
Annexure -A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.21827/2020 DATED 08.02.2021 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. Annexure -A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 16.02.2021 ALONG WITH ITS POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of U.P. v. Harish ChandraReferred¶17
State of U.P. v. Harish Chandra [(1996) 9 SCC 309] · Who else cites this
Bhaskara Rao A.B. v. CBIReferred¶17
Bhaskara Rao A.B. v. CBI [(2011) 10 SCC 259] · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anupkumar M.A.
Renjith George
Anil K. Narendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
