A contempt case closed after the petitioner accepted that the respondent had complied with the directions of a previous judgment dated 17.12.2018 regarding applications for arrest under the dying in harness scheme.
Contempt case is closed. No further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA,
1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 491 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.12.2018 IN WP(C)NO.38035 OF 2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
SUNIL KUMAR AGED 41 YEARS S/O.LATE RAJAN,KURIYAKKATTIL HOUSE, EDAYAR.P.O, EDAYAR,KOOTHATTUKULAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. ALIAS M.CHERIAN SRI.K.M.RAPHY SMT.ANJALY ELIAS SHRI.BRISTO S PARIYARAM
RESPONDENT:
BIJU PRABHAKAR IAS
AGE AND FATHER NAME OF THE RESPONDENT IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,TRANSPORT BHAVAN,FORT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023. BY ADV DEEPU THANKAN, SC FOR KSRTC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Cont.case(c)491 OF 2021 2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed this Contempt Case, alleging noncompliance of the directions contained in Annexure-A1 judgment of this Court dated 17.12.2018 in W.P.(C)No.38035 of 2018, whereby that writ petition was disposed of by directing the respondent herein to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts.P4 and P5 applications made by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner, his mother and also the appellants in Ext.P2 appeal, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of that judgment. In the said judgment, it was made clear that this Court has not expressed anything as to the entitlement or eligibility of the petitioner for appointment under dying in harness scheme, and it is for the respondent herein to take appropriate decision, strictly in accordance with law. All legal and factual contentions raised by the petitioner were left open to be raised before the 2nd respondent at appropriate stage.
admission, the learned Standing Counsel for KSRTC was directed to get instructions.
Cont.case(c)491 OF 2021 3
KSRTC submitted that the respondent shall issue a formal order, pursuant to the directions contained in Annexure A1 judgment, within two days.
Recording the above submission made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, this Contempt Case is closed.
Sd/-
ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE
yd
4
Cont.case(c)491 OF 2021
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17/12/2018 IN WP(C)NO.38035 OF 2018 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE NO.PL15/002526/18 DATED 08/05/2019 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
Sunil Kumar
Biju Prabakar IAS
Kerala State Road Transport Corporation
Anil K.Narendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
