effect and the plaintiff obtained right, title and possession over plaint A schedule property. That Will was also not produced by the plaintiff. Plaintiff's family house is situated on the western portion of plaint A schedule property. On the eastern portion, an old shed existed, where the plaintiff conducted business in hay. Plaint B schedule property is the way leading to the eastern portion of plaint A schedule property. That is the only way to the eastern side of plaint A schedule. Plaintiff and his predecessors were conducting hay business since last more than 60 years. Plaint B schedule way is an ancient way used for that purpose. Plaintiff and his predecessors used plaint B schedule way openly, continuously, peaceably without objection, as of right and as an easement for more than 60 years and thereby they have acquired a prescriptive easement right over plaint B schedule pathway. Since the residential building occupied the entire western portion abutting a public road, there is no other access to enter the hay shed on the eastern portion of plaint A schedule property. Plaintiff was also entitled to use plaint B schedule way by easement of necessity as well, as originally plaint A and B schedule properties belonged to a common owner and by severance it devolved on different persons.
