Mercy v. Seleena
Case brief
What is this about?
A regular second appeal filed by Mercy was dismissed for non-prosecution as defects were not cured by 18.01.2018 and no representation was filed on 02.02.2018.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and all pending interlocutory applications are dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 13TH MAGHA, 1939
RSA.No. 1214 of 2005
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 20.06.2005 IN AS 122/2001 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 30.06.2001 IN OS 1084/1999 of ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
MERCY, W/O.MULLAKKARA JOY KODAKARA VILLAGE & DESOM,, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADV.BINOY RAM V.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1, 3 TO 7/1ST DEFENDANT:
1. SELEENA, THEKKINIYATH KUNJUVAREED, KODAKARA VILLAGE AND DESOM,, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MERCY, W/O.MULLAKKARA JOY KODAKARA VILLAGE & DESOM,, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
- respondent
SELEENA, THEKKINIYATH KUNJUVAREED, KODAKARA VILLAGE AND DESOM,, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
- respondent
LEELA, W/O. THAISUVALAPPIL RAGHAVAN, PANTHALLOOR DESOM, NELLAYI VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
- respondent
SHAJI RAGHAVAN, S/O. THAISUVALAPPIL RAGHAVAN, NELLAI VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
- respondent
RAJEEV, S/O. THAISUVALAPPIL RAGHAVAN, PANTHALLOOR DESOM, NELLAYI VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court