P.P Padmini v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal was allowed to be withdrawn. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the appeal accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 12TH MAGHA, 1939
RSA.No. 399 of 2016 (E)
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 12-12-2014 IN AS NO.15/2012 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - I, KALPETTA
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 09-07-2012 IN OS NO.238/2010 of SUB COURT, SULTHANBATHERY
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:-
1 P.P PADMINI, AGED 56 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, W/O.RAVEENDRAN, NADUPARAMBIL HOUSE, MYLAMBADI, KRISHNAGIRI VILLAGE, SULTHANBATHERY TALUK.
2 K.P.LALITHA, AGED 52 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, W/O.CHANDRAN, GOVINDAM HOUSE, MYLAMBADI, KRISHNAGIRI VILLAGE, SULTHANBATHERY TALUK.
BY ADVS.DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM SRI.T.K.SAJEEV
- RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
CANARA BANK, SULTHANBATHERY BRANCH, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER AND PRINCIPAL OFFICER, RESIDING AT SULTHANBATHERY AMSOM DESAM OF SULTHANBATHERY TALUK, SULTHANBATHERY.P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN - 673 592.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.P. Padmini
- appellant
K.P. Lalitha
- respondent
Canara Bank, Sultانباتہری Branch
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court