recovery of the buildings situated in plaint A schedule therein. In that case, a question of kudikidappu was raised which was referred to the Land Tribunal concerned for adjudication. Land Tribunal, after taking evidence, entered a finding that the defendants in that suit (defendants 1 to 3 herein) were entitled to Kudikidappu rights. Recording that finding, the suit was dismissed. The plaintiffs filed an appeal against rejection of their claim in respect of one of the buildings, which is situated in the present C schedule. That appeal was allowed. In execution, the person at present in occupation of the C schedule was evicted. Later, a compromise was arrived at between the parties and the property now shown in C schedule was gifted to the son of the defendant in the earlier suit. Ext.B1 is the gift deed executed in favour of the son of the defendant in O.S.No. 640 of 1970 in respect of plaint C schedule. According to the plaintiffs, in the present suit they have no objection in allotting 10 cents each to 1st defendant and 3rd defendant in kudikidappu right. Rest of the property has to be secured by putting up a boundary, is the submission.
