In this contempt proceedings, the Court suspended contempt proceedings after the Government Pleader pointed out that final orders were passed belatedly on 2.6.2018. The case was closed, with liberty to challenge the order later.
Contempt case closed; liberty granted to challenge the final order dated 2.6.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 23RD JYAISHTA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 828 of 2018 IN WPC. 1294/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 1294/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S):
GURUVAYOORAPPAN,AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.LATE AYYASWAMY, RAJAYYA ILLAM,KANJIKODE.
BY ADV.SRI.P.R.VENKETESH
RESPONDENT(S):
JYOTHI M.C, FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN,SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND TRIBUNAL,OTTAPALAM,PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.VINITHA B
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-06-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
dlk/13/6/18
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
in
Dated this the 13th day of June, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining
that, the directives contained in the judgment dated 13.1.2017
are not complied with.
Government Pleader point out that, final orders are passed on
2.6.2018. Therefore, even though orders are passed belatedly in
violation of the directions, I do not find any reason to pursue
the contempt case any further.
Contempt case is closed, leaving open the liberty of the
petitioner to challenge the order so passed.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/13/6/
Guruvaayoorappan
Jyothi M.C
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
