This is a contempt of court petition filed against a respondent for non-compliance with a direction in a preceding writ decision. Upon hearing, the court found the direction had been complied with and closed the contempt proceedings.
Closed the contempt of court case as the alleged non-compliance was not found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 801 of 2018
-------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 37411/2017 of THIS HON'BLE COURT, DATED 01-03-2018
---------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
ELDOSE K.G., AGED 54 YEARS, S/O GEEVARGHESE, KAKKATTIL HOUSE, NORTH MAZHUVANNUR, IRAPURAM PO, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT- 683541.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY SRI.ANIL GEORGE
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 IN WPC :
SMT. A SHINAMOL I.A.S AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALABHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- PIN-695001.
BY SRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC,
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-06-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp 7/6/2018
Con.Case(C).No. 801 of 2018
--------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 01/3/2018 IN WPC NO. 37411/2017
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
bp 7/6/2018
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
Cont. of Court Case (C). No. 801 OF 2018
Dated this the 06th day of June, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt of court case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the direction contained in the judgment in W.P.(C). No. 37411/2017, dated 01.03.2018 is not complied with by the respondent. Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the direction is complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court proceedings any further.
Accordingly, the contempt of court case is closed.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
DCS
Eldose K.G.
Smt. A Shinamol
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
