In this contempt case, the petitioner alleged non-compliance with previous directives. However, after hearing, the court accepted counsel's submission that the directives were complied with and closed the proceedings without further necessity.
Contempt case closed as the petitioner submitted that directives were complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 582 of 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25818/2017 DATED 19-12-2017
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC NO.25818/2017
RATHEESH R. S/O.REGHUNATHAN, AGED 38 YEARS, TC 3/391, ALAPPURATHUPUTHAN VEEDU, T.K.D, ROAD, MUTTADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 025.
BY ADVS.SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN SRI.S.R.AJITH
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN WPC NO. 25818/2017:
DEEPA (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, THIRUVNANATHPAURAM CORPORATION, OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM-695 033.
BY SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR,SC,
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-06-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sdr/5.6.18
Con.Case(C).No. 582 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE -A CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 19/12/2017 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 25818/2017 (B)
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES NIL
/TRUE COPY/
PA TO JUDGE
sdr/5.6.18
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
COC No.582 of 2018
Dated this the 5th day of June, 2018
J U D G M E N T
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner
complaining that, the directives contained in the judgement dated 19.12.2017 is not complied with.
for petitioner submitted that, the directives contained in the judgment are complied with.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court proceedings any further. Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY
JUDGE
smv 5.6.2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has failed to comply with directives contained in the judgment dated 19.12.2017 in WPC No. 25818/2017.
Ratheesh R.
Deepa
Shaji P. Chaly
Deepa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
