In a contempt case, the petitioner claimed compliance with directives from a previous judgment dated 11.08.2017. Upon review, the Court found the directives complied with and closed the contempt proceedings.
Contempt of court case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 334 of 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.30748/2015 of THIS HON'BLE COURT, DATED 11-08-2017.
-----------
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C)
M/S.HOTEL DONA CASTLE, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, E. J. DAVIS, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O. LATE E. M. JOSEPH.
BY ADV.SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3 IN WP(C):
1. RISHIRAJ SINGH, IPS, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695033.
2. N.S.SURESH, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, KOLLAM-1.
3. TOM JOSE, I. A. S., AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY, TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.VINITHA B.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-06-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
TS
Con.Case(C).No. 334 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)'ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.8.2017 IN WPC.NO.30748/2015 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
ANNEXURE B PHOTOCOPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 29.8.2017 SENT TO THE RESPONDENTS.
ANNEXURE C PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 30.1.2018 SENT TO THE RESPONDENTS.
RESPONDENT(S)'ANNEXURES- NIL
/TRUE COPY/
PS TO JUDGE
TS
05.06.2018
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
COC No.334 of 2018
Dated this the 5th day of June, 2018
J U D G M E N T
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner
complaining that, the directives contained in the judgement dated 11.8.2017 is not complied with.
for petitioner submitted that, the directives contained in the judgment are complied with.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court proceedings any further. Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
smv
5.6.2018
M/s. Hotel Dona Castle
Rishiraj Singh
N.S. Suresh
Tom Jose
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
