This is a contempt case regarding the alleged non-compliance of directives in a prior W.P.(C) order. The court found that the respondents had complied with the directives and the respondent was present. The contempt case was accordingly closed without further proceedings.
Contempt case closed; no further action taken.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1940
Con.Case(C).No. 1320 of 2017
THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)NO.36013/2016 DATED 01-12-2016.
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS
BY ADV.SRI.A.B.JALEEL.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.4:
S.A. SAJNA, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ROADS, SUB DIVISION NGO QUARTERS, THRIKKAKARA - 682 021.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.VINITHA B.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-06-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs. 07/06/2018.
Con.Case(C).No. 1320 of 2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE R(A) COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF EMLI DATED 19/08/2017. ANNEXURE R(B) COPY OF THE LETTER NO.C-GL 1020/2015 DATED 28/09/2017. ANNEXURE R1(C) COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DOCTOR OF CIMAR FERTILITY CENTRE, EDAPPALLY.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
rs. 07/06/2018.
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.(C)No.1320 of 2017
in
W.P.(C)No.36013 of 2016
Dated this the 6th day of June, 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining
that the directives contained in the judgment dated 1.12.2016
is not complied with. Consequent to the delay on the part of
the respondent to respond and the time taken for filing affidavit, respondent was directed to be present before this
Court today.
for the petitioner as well as learned Government Pleader
submitted that, directives are complied with. The respondent is
present before this Court. In view of the compliance of the
C.O.(C)No.1320 of 2017 in
2
W.P.(C)No.36013 of 2016
order, I do not intend to pursue the contempt case any further.
Personal appearance is dispensed with.
Therefore, the contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/6/6/18
P.A. Babu and Others
S.A. Sajna
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
