In this contempt case, the petitioner alleged non-compliance of interim directions. The court, noting substantive compliance, held the finality of the remaining matter open for statutory authority consideration and closed the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 19TH POUSHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 2156 of 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35267/2016 OF THE HONOURABLE COURT.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
KUMARI GIRIJA, AGED 66, D/O. ALLYAMMA, POOJAKUNNEL, KALAVAMKODAM P.O.,CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV.SRI.J.OM PRAKASH
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT :
RAJEEV MERHISHI, WORKING AS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, 2ND FLOOR NDCC II BUILDING, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110001.
BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASG SRI.A.R.GANGADAS, CGC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-012018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PBS
Con.Case(C).No. 2156 of 2017
APPEDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P(C)NO.35267/2016 DATED 9/1/2017. ANNEXURE B A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DATED 9.8.2017. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20/12/2017 PASSED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS. ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATEWD 03-01-2018 BY THE UNDER SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS TO THE PETITIONER.
/TRUE COPY/
PA TO JUDGE
PBS
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
COC No.2156 of 2017
----------------------------------------------Dated this the 9th day of January, 2018
J U D G M E N T
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the interim order passed by this court on 9.1.2017 is not complied with.
for petitioner pointed out that, substantively directions are complied with. However, in respect of one matter, finality is not attained.
Leaving open to pursue the remedy in respect of the same and consideration by the respective statutory authority, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
smv 9.1.2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner must be held in contempt for non-compliance with directions in the interim order dated 09.01.2017.
KUMARI GIRIJA
RAJEEV MERHISHI
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
