K.Vijayan v. Rita Teaopia I.A.S
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed contempt petition for non-compliance with judgment dated 03.08.2017. Respondent submitted compliance via order on 26.08.2017. Court found no reason to proceed and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case dismissed by closure; no further proceedings initiated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 19TH POUSHA, 1939 Con.Case(C).No. 1956 of 2017
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 15726/2013 DATED 03-08-2017)
CONTEMPT PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
K.VIJAYAN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O LATE.KUNJUKRISHNAN,WATCHMAN, MARINE PRODUCTS EXPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, (M.P.E.D.A) PANAMPILLY AVENUE, P.B.NO.4272, KOCHI-682 036, NOW RESIDING AT CC -19/1093 A, NELSON MANDELA ROAD, PALLURUTHY, COCHIN, ERNAKULAM, PIN.682 006.
BY ADV.SRI.C.K.SREEJITH
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT.3:
MISS.RITA TEAOPIA I.A.S., AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION, UDYOG BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 107. OTHER PERSONAL DETAILS ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should proceed with the contempt case given compliance with court directives.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Vijayan
- respondent
Rita Teapia I.A.S.
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court