In this contempt petition, the petitioner claimed non-compliance with a prior judgment. The respondent counsel submitted that the directives were complied with, leading the single judge to close the case immediately without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 18TH POUSHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 2145 of 2017
---------------------------
WP(C) 20022/2017 of THIS HONOURABLE COURT
PETITIONER(S)
A.SHAJAHAN, S/O.ABDUL KAREEM,AGED 44,SEENA MANZIL, MEERAMVETTI,PERINGALA,NEDUMANGADU, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV.SRI.S.NIDHEESH
RESPONDENTS :
HEMACHANDRAN,I.P.S, S/O.AND AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, NOW WORKING AS THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.
BY SRI.T.P SAJAN, SC,
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-01-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
Con.Case(C).No. 2145 of 2017
----------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC 20022/17 DATED 16/6/2017. ANNEXURE B: COPY REQUEST DATED 7/11/2017. ANNEXURE C: COPY POSTAL RECEIPT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD. ANNEXURE D: COPY REQUEST DATED 20/11/2017. ANNEXURE E: COPY POSTAL RECEIPT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
bp
SHAJI P.CHALY, J.
======================== Cont.Case (C)No.2145 of 2017
======================== Dated this the 8th day of January 2018
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 16.6.2017 is not complied with. Today when the matter is taken up, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directives contained in the judgment are complied with.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue with the contempt case any further. Accordingly, the contempt of court case is closed.
SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE
jm/
W.P.(C) No. 2
A. SHAJAHAN
HEMACHANDRAN
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
