Disposed

M. Muhammed Ali v. District Collector

Kerala HC13 Nov 2017WP(C)/5640/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court observed that the petitioner's grievance regarding land tax is redressed. Consequently, the writ petition was closed with liberty to approach the court for any future grievances on the same subject matter. No substantive legal propositions or decisions were made.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed with liberty to approach the court for future grievances on the same subject matter.

M. Muhammed Ali Vs District Collector — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

¶4

MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/22ND KARTHIKA, 1939

¶5

WP(C).No. 5640 of 2013 (D)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

M. MUHAMMED ALI, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.MAMMU HAJI, RESIDING AT MYLAPPURAM, KARUVARAKUNDU AMSOM, CHERUMBA DESOM, MALAPPURAM.

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.P.A.HARISH

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM. 676505.

¶11

2. THE TAHSILDAR NILAMBUR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, NILAMBUR.679329

¶12

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,

¶13

KERALA ESTATE VILLAGE, KARUVARAKUNDU, MALAPPURAM - 676523

¶14

4. THE SUB REGISTRAR, SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, MELATTOOR. 679326

¶15

5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695001.

¶16

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT VINEETHA HARIRAJ

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-11-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

K.V.

¶19

WP(C).No. 5640 of 2013 (D)

¶20

¶21

PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS :

¶22

EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DOCUMENT NO.2008/2012 DATED 27/3/2012.

¶23

EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DOCUMENT NO.1563/2003 DATED 11/4/2003.

¶24

EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE KARAYA CERTIFICATE NO.1455/06 IN SM PROCEEDING NO.1085/06 DATED 20/10/2006.

¶25

EXHIBIT P4. TRUE COPY OF THE LAND REVENUE RECEIPT DATED 22/1/2011. EXHIBIT P5. TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX AND TRANSFER FEE DATED 4/4/2012.

¶26

EXHIBIT P6. TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAT ISSUED BY THE LAND BOARD TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DISTRICT COLLECTOR.

¶27

EXHIBIT P7. TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

¶28

EXHIBIT P8. TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶29

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

¶30

R2(A) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO C1-17399/12 DATED 27.3.2012.

¶31

R2(B) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO 10654/N1/08/RD DATED 24.3.2008.

¶32

/TRUE COPY/

¶33

K.V. P.S.TO JUDGE

¶34

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

¶35

-----------------------------------------W.P.(C) No. 5640 of 2013 (D)

¶36

-----------------------------------------Dated: 13^th November, 2017

¶37

J U D G M E N T

¶38

The petitioner submits that the grievance, as of now, is redressed insofar as the petitioner's land tax is being received.

¶39

In such circumstance, the writ petition would stand closed, with liberty to approach this Court, if at all any further grievance arises on the same subject matter.

¶40

Sd/-

¶41

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE

¶42

jjj 13/11/17

M. Muhammed Ali v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M. Muhammed Ali v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Sudarsanan Vs the District Collector

Anoop Balakrishnan Nair Krishna Vs Regional Passport Officer

Chalil Mariya Vs Tahasildar, Chavakkad Taluk

Reni Koyipram Vs T Madhu

Suma Vs State of Kerala

P.a.Babu Vs State of Kerala