Mrs.Mary Chacko v. Sudhir
Case brief
What is this about?
This second appeal regarding the legal representatives of a deceased plaintiff was dismissed as infructuous at the hearing, with pending interlocutory applications also dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal has been dismissed as infructuous. Relevant interlocutory applications have also been dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/15TH POUSHA, 1938
SA.No. 525 of 2000 (D)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18-12-1999 IN AS 122/1995 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM.
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14-08-1995 IN OS 1795/1992 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT,ERNAKULAM.
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/ADDITIONAL PLAINTIFFS 2 TO 5 - LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DECEASED PLAINTIFF:
1. MRS.MARY CHACKO, W/O. LATE K.M. CHACKO, KOLAPPILLIL HOUSE, THEKKUMBHAGAM, TRIPUNITHURA.
2. MINI CHACKO, D/O. LATE K.M. CHACKO, -DO- -DO-
3. SHINI CHACKO, D/O. LATE K.M. CHACKO,
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MRS.MARY CHACKO
- appellant
MINI CHACKO
- appellant
SHINI CHACKO
- appellant
SHIBU CHACKO
- respondent
SUDHIR
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court