co-owner has every right to transfer his joint share even to a third party prior to the partition of the shares by metes and bounds. Therefore, even if Ext.B1 was cancelled, it will not affect the right of the plaintiff's brother over the properties which he had obtained by way of intestate succession. The description of the schedule in Ext.B6 sale deed, by which the plaintiff's brother sold away the property to Lukose, shows that he has sold away 50 cents on the southern most portion of the property, just adjacent to the western side of the eastern road, out of 2.49 Acres of land, which is a part of total extent of 3.73 Acres. Thus, as rightly observed by the lower appellate court, it could be seen from Ext.B6 that though the co-owner had sold away his property out of his share, he had sold specific plot with specific demarcating boundaries and the purchaser had accepted that property. More over, the purchaser in Ext.B6, Mr.Lukose, was in possession of the property, under janmam right, by way of purchase certificate also. Thus, the purchase certificate also shows that 50 cents lie
