Antony S/O.Basil v. Esthar Raphael
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed by Antony against certain judgments and decrees is dismissed as it is not pressed by the learned counsel.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/14TH POUSHA, 1938
SA.NO. 298 OF 2003 (B)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28-11-2002 IN A.S. NO. 132 OF 2001 OF THE PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,KOCHI
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20-09-2001 IN O.S. NO. 804 OF 1999 OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT,KOCHI
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
ANTONY, S/O. BASIL, VALIYA PARAMBIL, RESIDING AT C.C. 14/1004, MOOLAMKUZHI, RAMESWARAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK.
BY POWER OF ATTORNEY JOSEPHINE ANTONY OF DO-DO-
BY ADV. SMT.VANAJA MADHAVAN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ANTONY, S/O. BASIL
- respondent
ESTHAR RAPHAEL
- respondent
PHILO
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court