Balan v. Mahesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court disposed of a regular second appeal where the parties settled their disputes via a compromise agreement during the hearing, barring any specific issues to be addressed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal dismissed based on the parties' compromise agreement; pending interlocutory applications closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/15TH POUSHA, 1938
RSA.No. 769 of 2010 (G )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 10-12-2009 IN AS 39/2008 of ADDL. SUB COURT ,THALASSERY
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 22-01-2008 IN OS 388/2005 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, KANNUR
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
BALAN, KAKKANENGOTTATHU, CHIRAKKAL, KANNUR.
BY ADV. SRI.V.PREMCHAND
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
MAHESH, VARAYAMBETH, NALINI NIVAS, NEAR ARAVILEKANDY MUTHAPPEN TEMPLE,, CHIRAKKEL, KANNUR -670011.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Balan, Kakkanengottathu, Chirakkal, Kannur
- respondent
Mahesh, Varayambeth, Nalini Nivas, Near Aravilekandy Muthappen Temple, Chirakkal
Coram
K. Harilal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court