Sinoby v. Sindhu Sinoby
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Bench dismissed an appeal against Family Court order awarding maintenance to wife and minor child under Section 125 Cr.P.C., finding evidence supported liability to maintain despite pre-marital birth of child.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed maintaining Family Court order awarding Rs. 2,500 monthly maintenance to wife and minor child.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2017/31ST SRAVANA, 1939
RPFC.No. 213 of 2017 ()
MC 29/2015 of FAMILY COURT, KATTAPPANA
-----------------
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT:
SINOBY,
AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.MATHEW, NEERANANICKAL HOUSE, ATHMAVU CITY KARA, KANTHIPPARA VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a father born prior to marriage is liable to maintain his wife and minor daughter under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
Whether the award of Rs. 2,500 monthly maintenance is excessive or unreasonable warranting interference.
Whether the findings of the Family Court suffer from any illegality, impropriety or incorrectness.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SINOBY
- respondent
SINDHU SINOBY
- respondent
SHIFENNA SINOBY
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court