Anoop v. Pushpakumari
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Kerala, Single Judge, Revision Petition. The court revised a family court order fixing maintenance at Rs.6,000/month under Section 125 Cr.P.C. No interference found as the award was not exorbitant.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed; petitioner allowed two months to pay entire arrears.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2017/31ST SRAVANA, 1939
RPFC.No. 139 of 2017 ()
MC 225/2015 of FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT:
ANOOP AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.ANANDAN KANI, VISHNU TEMPLE, NEAR KATTAKKAL PERINGAMMALA, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
PUSHPAKUMARI
AGED 23 YEARS, D/O.SASIKALA, ANOOP VILASOM, KOCHADAPPUPARA, KARIMAMCODE, PACHA, PALODE, PALODE VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAURAM DISTRICT - 695 562.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the quantum of maintenance awarded by the lower court was exorbitant or unreasonable warranting interference.
Whether the revision petitioner can contest maintenance based on alleged income of the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anoop
- respondent
Pushpakumari
Coram
B.Sudheendra Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court