Dismissed
Regional Transport Officer v. Nenco Hospitality Management Pvt.Ltd.
Kerala HCRP/165/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2017/12TH JYAISHTA, 1939
RP.No. 165 of 2017 (G)
-------------------------------(AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C).NO. 861/2017 DATED 02-02-2017)
REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN W.P(C):
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 030.
2. TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, TRANS TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 015.
BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):
NENCO HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD., 39/6615, 1ST FLOOR, PALLATH BUSINESS CENTRE, KURISUPALLY ROAD,M.G.ROAD, RAVIPURAM, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 016 (REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.NITHIN).
BY SRI.G.HARIHARAN
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
R.P.NO.165/2017
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE 1 COPY OF THE INSPECTION REPORT . ANNEXURE II COPY OF THE ORDER NO.R5/884/2007/E DATED 07/01/2017.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Review Petition No.165 of 2017
in
W.P.(C).No.861 of 2017.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2017.
O R D E R
When this review petition was taken up for admission, the learned counsel for the respondent has made available a communication dated 20.05.2017 sent by the Deputy Transport Commissioner (CZ-II), Ernakulam to the Advocate General. The communication referred to above indicates that the vehicle of the respondent referred to in the review petition complies with all the statutory requirements for registration. The learned Government Pleader accepts the communication dated 20.05.2017 and submits that the review petition is not pressed in the light of the said communication. The review petition, in the circumstances, is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
Kvs/-
// true copy //
P.A. TO JUDGE.
The Regional Transport Officer
Transport Commissioner
Nenco Hospitality Management Pvt. Ltd.
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court