The petitioner filed a contempt petition against the respondent for alleged non-compliance with the judgment in W.P(C).No.21225/2016. The respondent's counsel submitted that the direction was complied with. The court closed the contempt case without prejudice to the petitioner's right to challenge the compliance order.
The contempt case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2017/31ST JYAISHTA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 727 of 2017 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C).NO. 21225/2016, DATED 29-06-2016
PETITIONER(S)/1ST PETITIONER IN WPC :
SREEKUTTAN A.V.,
AGED 44 YEARS, S/O. VASUDEVAN, COURT OFFICER, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. PERMANENT RESIDENCE AT AREEKARATHIL HOUSE, CHENNITHALA P.O., MAVELIKKARA - 690 105
BY ADVS. DR.K.P.PRADEEP
SRI.SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN SMT.NEENA ARIMBOOR SRI.T.T.BIJU SMT.T.THASMI
RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT IN WPC :
SRINIVAS B., IAS, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SON OF NOT KNOWN, RESIDING AT NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ROOM NO. 301, 3RD FLOOR, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT ANNEXE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S.KANNAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
Con.Case(C).No. 727 of 2017 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.06.2016 IN W.P(C).NO. 21225 OF 2016(C) OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE
Msd.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Contempt Case (C).No.727 of 2017.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 21st day of June, 2017.
J U D G M E N T
The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that the direction issued by this Court has been complied with. A copy of the order passed in this connection was also made available at the time of hearing. In the circumstances, the contempt case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order in appropriate proceedings, if he chooses to do so.
Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
Kvs/-
// true copy //
PA to Judge.
Sreekuttan A.V.
Srinivas B.
P.B.Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
