The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking registration of a document. The High Court allowed the petition relying on a previous judgment.
Directed the first respondent to cause registration of the original of Ext.P2 document forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/30TH JYAISHTA, 1939
WP(C).No. 19412 of 2017 (B)
PETITIONER:
PADMANABAN AGED 58 YEARS, S/O ARAMUKHAN, MAPPAL HOUSE, PONNANI (P.O) MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PIN-679 577.
BY ADV. SRI.T.K.MOIDEEN KUTTY
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE SUB REGISTRAR, PONNANI MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PIN-679577.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695 023.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SURIN GEORGE IYPE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sdr/-
WP(C).No. 19412 of 2017 (B)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DOC NO.933/1993 OF SRO PONNANI. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT PRESENTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR REGISTRATION DATED 1.06.2017, EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FAVOUR OF HIS WIFE.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 3.06.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.06.2016 IN WP(C)NO.21571 OF 2016 IN SUNILKUMAR VS SUB REGISTRAR, PONANI AND ANOTHER.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL ------------------------------------------
/TRUE COPY/
PA TO JUDGE
sdr/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
-------------------------------------------W.P.(C).No.19412 of 2017
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 20th day of June, 2017
J U D G M E N T
The issue raised in the writ petition is covered in favour of the petitioner by Ext.P4 judgment. In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed and the first respondent is directed to cause registration of the original of Ext.P2 document forthwith, if the same is otherwise in order.
Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE
rsr
Padmanaban
The Sub Registrar, Ponnani
State of Kerala
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
