Contempt case closed as the respondent Government Pleader confirmed compliance with a prior court direction. Petitioners retain right to challenge the compliance order in appropriate proceedings.
Contempt case closed without prejudice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2017/31ST JYAISHTA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 401 of 2017 (S)
----------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C).NO. 35566 OF 2016, DATED 24-11-2016
PETITIONER(S) :
..2/-
..2..
Con.Case(C).No. 401 of 2017 (S)
17. SASI.C.K., S/O. KUNHAN, CHALIYAKUNDENPARAMB HOUSE, KALPETTA.
BY ADVS. SRI.RAHUL SASI SMT.NEETHU PREM
..3/-
..3..
Con.Case(C).No. 401 of 2017 (S)
RESPONDENT(S) :
ASHOK KUMAR, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, WAYANAD, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, KALPETTA-673 121.
BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.SANTHOSH KUMAR
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
Con.Case(C).No. 401 of 2017 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A1: A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.11.2016 IN W.P(C).NO. 35566 OF 2016.
ANNEXURE A2: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATIONS FOR VARIATION OF PERMIT CONDITIONS SUBMITTED THE PETITIONERS HEREIN ALONG WITH THE CASH RECEIPT EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF REQUISITE FEE.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE
Msd.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Contempt Case (C).No.401 of 2017.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 21st day of June, 2017.
J U D G M E N T
The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that the direction issued by this Court has been complied with. A copy of the order passed in this connection was also made available at the time of hearing. In the circumstances, the contempt case is closed without prejudice
to the right of the petitioners to challenge the order in appropriate proceedings, if they choose to do so.
Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
Kvs/-
// true copy //
PA TO JUDGE.
Gangadharan and others
Ashok Kumar
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
