Lucipher v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed to quash suspension and enquiry order became infructuous after the loan account was settled by the fourth respondent bank with the petitioner via one-time settlement.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to settlement of the loan account.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/25TH ASWINA, 1938
WP(C).No. 7186 of 2007 (E)
PETITIONER(S):
LUCIPHER, CHAKKALAKKAL HOUSE, POOTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR-680004.
BY ADVS.SRI.SUCIPHER (PARTY APPEARING IN PERSON)
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
- REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.
2. THE SPECIAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, IT DEPT. & DIRECTOR, KSITM, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lucipher
- respondent
The State of Kerala
- respondent
The Special Secretary to Government, IT Dept. & Director, KSITM
- respondent
The Chief Co-ordinator (District Collector)
- respondent
Canara Bank
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court