The court closed contempt proceedings as an appeal against the relevant order was pending, deeming there was no reasonable ground to pursue the case further.
Contempt case closed; remedy to contest the appeal left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/22ND ASWINA, 1938 Con.Case(C).No. 1293 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).15263/2016 ------------------------------------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 15263/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 19-04-2016
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):
N.K. KURIAKOSE S/O.KORAH, AGED 64 YEARS, NARAKATUKUDIYIL HOUSE, KRALIYELI, VENGOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BINU PAUL
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN W.P.(C):
1.M.G. RAMACHANDRAN
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER(IN CHARGE) (SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE IN CHARGE) OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA., PIN-686661,
2. MR.SHAMEER VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, KOMBANAD, VENGOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683545.
R1&R2 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER ARAVIND KUMAR BABU
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1293 of 2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.4.2016 IN W.P.(C) NO.15263 OF 2016 OF THE HON'BLE COURT.
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE R2(a) : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA BEARING NO.A352/15 DATED 5.4.2016.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
smv
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
COC No.1293 of 2016
Dated this the 14th day of October, 2016
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives issued in the judgment dated 19.4.2016 is not complied with.
Therefore, contempt case is closed leaving open the remedy of the petitioner to contest the appeal proceedings.
Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
smv 14.10.2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should continue given a pending appeal against the order requiring implementation of directions.
N.K. KuriaKose
M.G. Ramachandran
Revenue Divisional Officer Muvattupuzha
Mr. Shameer
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
