The petitioner, who has approached this Court aggrieved by the steps taken by the respondent bank for recovery of defaulted loan amounts, appears to have approached this Court on an earlier occasion, through W.P.(C) 17916/2014, when faced with similar proceedings initiated against him by the respondent bank. On that occasion, by Ext.R(1)(a) judgment, this Court had granted the petitioner the facility of payment of the entire loan amounts in six equal monthly instalments, along with the regular payment of EMIs. It appears that, the petitioner did not comply with the said directions, but chose to file an Interlocutory Application(I.A.), seeking extension of time, to comply with the directions in the judgment. By R(1)(b) order, the said extension of time was also granted. Thereafter, by a 2nd I.A., the petitioner once again approached this Court and by R(1)(c) order, this Court had again granted the petitioner one weeks' time, to remit the amounts as directed by this Court. I find that the petitioner did not comply with the directions of this Court, even despite the enlargement of time, that was granted to him. Not only that, the petitioner has
