K.K.Nazar v. Sadique Ali
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt of court case alleging non-compliance with earlier court directives. Respondent submitted that an order had been passed complying with the court order of 9.9.2016. Court closed the contempt proceedings accordingly.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/21ST ASWINA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1639 of 2016 (S)
JUDGMENT DATED 01-06-0016 IN WP(C) 18209/2016
PETITIONER(S):
K.K.NAZAR, S/O KOCHUMUHAMMED, KARAKUNNATH HOUSE, PERINGALA P.O., ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.PRASAD CHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):
SADIQUE ALI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM-682 030.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.K.Nazar
- respondent
Sadique Ali
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court