Sunena Chandran v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged delayed issuance of SET examination certificate. Court dismissed petition as infructuous upon counsel's admission that certificate was received.
Petitioner challenged delayed issuance of SET examination certificate. Court dismissed petition as infructuous upon counsel's admission that certificate was received.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/21ST ASWINA, 1938
WP(C).No. 1328 of 2016 (M)
PETITIONER(S):
S.SUNENA CHANDRAN, AGED 30 YEARS, D/O.CHANDRAN E.K., EYYANI HOUSE, ARIMPUR P.O., TRICHUR - 680 620.
BY ADVS.SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI SMT.V.T.KAVITHA
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:-:
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 010.
2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 010.
3. DIRECTOR LBS CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, (A GOVERNMENT OF KERALA UNDERTAKING), NANDAVANAM, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 033.
4. VILLAGE OFFICER VATANAPPALLY, TRICHUR - 680 614.
R3 BY ADV .SMT K K RAZIYA [B/O] R1, R2 & R4 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
dlk
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
W.P.(C) No.1328 of 2016
Dated this the 13th day of October, 2016
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner
complaining that even though the petitioner has participated in the SET examination during June, 2015, and passed, the same, certificate is not issued
Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel
for the petitioner submitted that, the certificate is received by the petitioner and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY,JUDGE
//True Copy//
P.A.To Judge
dlk/13/10/
S. SUNENA CHANDRAN
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
DIRECTOR LBS CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
VILLAGE OFFICER VATANAPPALLY
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court