Disposed

Prasannakumari C.K v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC16 Jun 2015WP(C)/17925/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by a lower primary school assistant seeking a direction to the Secretary, General Education Department, to consider her revision petition regarding non-approval of her appointment order. Court directed the 1st respondent to pass orders within two months after hearing the petitioner and produce copies of the petition and judgment.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10 revision petition within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.

Prasannakumari C.K Vs State of Kerala — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 17925 of 2015 (M)

¶6

PETITIONER :

¶7

------------------

¶8

PRASANNAKUMARI C.K., AGED 44 YEARS, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, A.L.P SCHOOL, KARAMEL, ANNUR P.O, PAYYANNUR VIA, KANNUR DISTRICT. 670307.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.MURALI PALLATH SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN SRI.JAPA BALAN OLIVER

¶10

RESPONDENTS :

¶11

----------------------

¶12

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT., GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT (ANNEX), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

¶13

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014.

¶14

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KANNUR, THANA P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 670 002.

¶15

4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. 670 002.

¶16

5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. 670 141.

¶17

6. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PAYYANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. 670 307.

¶18

7. THE MANAGER

¶19

A.L.P SCHOOL, KARAMEL, ANNUR P.O., PAYYANNUR VIA, KANNUR DISTRICT. 670 307.

¶20

R1 TO R6 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. LOWSY A

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

¶23

WP(C).No. 17925 of 2015 (M)

¶24

APPENDIX

¶25

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶26

EXHIBIT P1: COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 5.6.06 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT.

¶27

EXHIBIT P2: COPY OF LETTER NO.3517/06 DATED 16.9.06 ISSUED BY 6TH RESPONDENT.

¶28

EXHIBIT P3: COPY OF ORDER NO.B6/8612/2006 K.DIS. DATED 09.05.07 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶29

EXHIBIT P4: COPY OF REVISION PETITION DATED 10.1.07 FILED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT.

¶30

EXHIBIT P5: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.DIS.7666/07/RA (3) DPI DATED 15.5.07. EXHIBIT P6: COPY OF ORDER NO.D/5510/2010 DATED 31.1.11 ISSUED BY 6TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P7: COPY OF LETTER DATED 18.6.12 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P8: COPY OF ORDER NO.B6/5281/13 K.DIS DATED 31.5.13. EXHIBIT P9: COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 1.7.13 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶31

EXHIBIT P10: COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10.6.15 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT.

¶32

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

¶37

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.17925 of 2015

¶38

............................................................. Dated this the 16^th day of June, 2015

¶39

J U D G M E N T

¶40

The petitioner who is working as an LPSA in A.L.P.School, Karamel, is aggrieved by the non-approval of her appointment for the period from 05.06.2006 to 14.07.2008. It is her case in the writ petition that she has been agitating the matter before the educational authorities and has now preferred Ext.P10 revision petition before the 1^st respondent. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1^st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10 revision petition within a prescribed time frame.

¶41

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

¶42

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I direct the 1^st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10 revision petition within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition, together with a copy of this judgment, before the 1^st respondent for further action.

¶43

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE

¶44

mns

Prasannakumari C.K v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prasannakumari C.K v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prasannakumari Vs K.C.Subran

K.Prasannakumar Vs K.M.Shaji

Anupama N. Vs State of Kerala

P.B.Dhanya Vs the State of Kerala

Sathi Babu Vs the Deputy Inspector General, Crpf

Jilcy Jose Vs the State of Kerala