T.P.Hariharan v. Kel
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged a settlement concerning pay revision arrears. The Court found the writ petition infructuous as the relevant petitioners had already received payment and no unrecovered claims existed for them.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to settlement of claims by the first respondent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2014/20TH JYAISHTA, 1936
WP(C).No. 21017 of 2006 (B)
PETITIONER(S) :-
1. T.P.HARIHARAN, S/O.PARAMESWARAN ACHARI, AGED 61 YEARS, SREEVALSAM, MURIYAMANGALAM, MAMALA P.O. - 682 305.
2. P.N.SIVADASAN, S/O.P.K.NARAYANAN, AGED 60 YEARS, USHA NIVAS, MAMALA P.O. - 682 305.
3. K.A.SUDARSHANAN, S/O.AYAPPAN KUNJU, AGED 58 YEARS, KALAVAMPARA NELEESWARAM P.O., VIA KALADY, ERNAKULAM DIST.
BY ADV. SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S) :-
1. KERALA ELECTRICAL AND ALLIED ENGINEERING CO.LTD. (KEL IN SHORT) REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 7TH FLOOR KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI-36.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.P. Hariharan
- petitioner
P.N. Sivadasan
- petitioner
K.A. Sudarshanana
- respondent
Kerala Electrical and Allied Engineering Co. Ltd.
- respondent
State of Kerala
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court