Mervin T.Vincent v. the Manager, Cahs Coyalmannam
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a writ petition challenging the non-declaration of the petitioner's probation. The court noted that a subsequent order by the third respondent had declared the petitioner's probation under the Kerala Education Rules, rendering the litigation unnecessary.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed after the third respondent declares the petitioner's probation by order dated 19.10.2013.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013/16TH KARTHIKA, 1935
WP(C).No. 24142 of 2013 (P)
PETITIONER:
MERVIN T.VINCENT HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (ENGLISH), C.A.H.S, COYALMANNAM PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.S.SUJIN
RESPONDENTS:
- THE MANAGER
C.A.H.S, COYALMANNAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
- THE HEAD MASTER
C.A.H.S, COYALMANNAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's writ petition challenging the non-declaration of his probation merits further consideration after a subsequent order declaring the probation.
Whether the writ petition should be closed upon admission of a fresh order declaring the petitioner's probation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mervin T.Vincent
- respondent
The Manager, C.A.H.S, Coyalmannam, Palakkad District
- respondent
The Head Master, C.A.H.S, Coyalmannam, Palakkad District
- respondent
District Educational Officer Palakkad
- respondent
State of Kerala
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court