K.G.Venugopalan v. the Thrissur Idstrict Panchayath
Case brief
What is this about?
This court closed a writ petition concerning the disposal of a representation by the District Panchayath, reserving liberty of the petitioner.
This court closed a writ petition concerning the disposal of a representation by the District Panchayath, reserving liberty of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2013/29TH JYAISHTA 1935
WP(C).No. 11868 of 2013 (G)
PETITIONER:
K.G.VENUGOPALAN AGED 53 YEARS S/O.GANGADHARAN, KAIPPAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ERIYAD P O KODUNGALLUR
BY ADVS.SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) SRI.SAJU.S.A SRI.K.C.KIRAN
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE THRISSUR IDSTRICT PANCHAYATH REP BY ITS SECRETARY, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680003
2. SECRETARY, THRISSUR DISTRICT PANCHAYATH AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680003
3. THE PRESIDENT THRISSUR DIST PANCHAYATH, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680003
4. THE CHAIRPERSON PUBLIC WORKS STANDING COMMITTEE THRISSUR DISTRICT PACHAYATH, AYYANTHOLE THRISSUR-680003
R1-4 BY ADV. SRI.K.B.GANGESH
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SUNITHA VINOD
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-06-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 11868 of 2013 (G)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXT.P1:-THE TRUE COPY OF THE TENDER NOTIFICATION PUBLISED IN MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DTD 11/12/2011
EXT.P3:-THE TRUE COPY OF THE DICISION OF THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH DTD 16/10/2012
EXT.P4:-TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH ON 26/12/2012 BY THE PETITIONER
EXT.P5:_THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO 30408/2012 BY THE PETITIONER
EXT.P6(A):-THE TRUE COPY OF THE NEWSPAPER REPORT PUBLISHED IN MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DTD 27/12/2012
EXT.P6(B):-THE TRUE COPY OF THE NEWSPAPER REPORT PUBLISHED IN MATRHUBHUMI DAILY DTD 29/11/2012
EXT.P9:-TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE PUBLISHED IN MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DTD 1/5/2013
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 11868 of 2013
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 19th day of June, 2013
J U D G M E N T
The main relief sought for is one with respect to the disposal of a representation. First respondent appears through counsel and submits that the representation has already been disposed of. It is for the petitioner to challenge the order, if it is prejudicial to him. Writ petition stands closed reserving liberty of the petitioner.
Sd/-
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE)
jma
//true copy//
P. A to Judge
K.G. VENUGOPALAN
THE THRISSUR DISTRICT PANCHAYATH
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court