M.Balachandran v. Kseb
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged the denial of promotion. Court found the petition infructuous as petitioners were subsequently promoted. Writ petition closed with liberty reserved to challenge aspects regarding promotion and service benefits.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed reserving liberty to challenge aspects regarding promotion and service benefits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2013/30TH JYAISHTA 1935
WP(C).No. 2861 of 2004 (N)
PETITIONER:
1. M.BALACHANDRAN, LINEMAN GRADE I, GRADATION NO.845, ELECTRICAL SECTION, UDMA ELECTRICAL DIVISION, KASARGOD.
2. SASIDHARAN K.,
- LINEMAN GRADE I, GRADATION NO.829, ELECTRICAL SECTION UDMA, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, KASARGOD.
3. JAYACHANDRAN P,
- LINEMAN GRADE I, GRADATION NO.895, ELECTRICAL SECTION UPPALA, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, KASARGOD.
4. K.V.BALAKRISHNAN,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding the denial of promotion has becomes infructuous as petitioners were subsequently promoted.
Whether liberty should be reserved to challenge any aspect regarding promotion and service benefits.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. BALACHANDRAN AND OTHERS
- respondent
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
- respondent
THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court