The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petition filed by teachers as infructuous without engaging in substantive reasoning or discussing any legal provisions or precedents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2013/17TH JYAISHTA 1935
WP(C).No. 8283 of 2005 (J)
PETITIONERS:
2
3
BY ADV. SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
R1 AND 2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. MUHAMMED SHAFI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-06-2013,, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. VINOD CHANDRAN,J.
======================
W.P.(C)No.8283 of 2005
=======================
Dated this the 7th day of June 2013
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the
writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE
ks.
True copy
P.S.To Judge
BIJU A SARASAM ORS
THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION TRIVANDRUM ORS
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
