In a matrimonial appeal, the court permitted the appellants time to file a regular compromise petition after counsel stated disputes were settled, closing the appeal without a final decision pending the petition's submission.
Time granted to file regular compromise petition; appeal closed pending filing and recall of judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/25TH MAGHA 1934 Mat.Appeal.No. 547 of 2011
APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONERS:
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
JUPUDI PRASAD, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. J. DAVID, 81 VENKATA REDDY NASAROAPET, GUNTUR DISTICT, ANDHRA PRADESH EMPLOYED AS CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (TRICHUR) FOREST COLONY, TRICHUR - 680 003.
BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14-022013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & P.D. RAJAN, JJ.
=======================
Mat. Appeal No. 547 of 2011
======================= Dated this the 14th day of February, 2013
JUDGMENT
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that parties in this appeal have settled the disputes between them. The learned counsel seeks time to file a regular compromise petition. Recording the above submission, we close the appeal. When the compromise petition is ready, the parties can file the same and bring it up by filing application for recalling the judgment.
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE.
P.D. RAJAN, JUDGE.
nkm.
B. SHOBA LIKHITHA
J. PRANITH
J. APOORVA
JUPUDI PRASAD
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
P.D. RAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
